They were trying to convince the Supreme Court
that there is something wrong with the end of the legislation,
and that the Supreme Court always needs people
who will uphold those own views.
But in my experience, if they'd not
should not have said why this shouldwhat's
the right decision?
Why were they voting against it?
But what they're saying is the end
of something befitting much more time is not,
it is here, and that is what Congress should be doing.
That Claudia Koraz休 snap just
to have this new Constitution that
would you have the 43rd soul Piaz van Paris
to encourage my family to save 15 years
and then I understand metro plan
incomiffs not at all
I agree I guess
that before and after conversation
November to New Jersey
without tremendous energy
how do you see thevos
how to think that summer
the
very good
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
the
Presenters
Prof. Dr. Tim A. Osswald
Zugänglich über
Offener Zugang
Dauer
00:54:56 Min
Aufnahmedatum
2018-05-30
Hochgeladen am
2018-05-30 10:28:52
Sprache
de-DE