So what am I going to do with you today? I already started with my little introduction,
trying to show what my motivation is for this kind of research and talk. I would then go
a little bit into the idea of excellence. What does excellence really mean? We all talk
about excellence in universities and recently also in German universities, but what does
it really mean? I will then talk about visibility because excellence without visibility is not
there and there might also be visibility without excellence in research, which could be a problem.
I would then like to take you with me into some results of own empirical research projects
about the obvious or perceived difficulties or contradictions between equality and excellence
and also about excellence and visibility of excellence. My conclusion will be that we
have to rethink our concept of excellence and we also have to improve visibility, in
particular visibility of younger researchers. So as I said, one of my motivation or my team's
motivation to look into these issues is the situation of women in science and we can still
see, and mathematics is a very good example for this, that women in science are still
underrepresented very often in many subjects and their achievements are not taken into
account or not seen very often. This slide shows some very good and prominent women in
science, but if we see it in general, we can see that the scientific system, at least in
Germany, has developed over centuries under the exclusion of women and in Germany, for
example, women were only admitted at universities a little bit more than 100 years ago and for
a long time their contributions to science, to research were not recognized or they were
even questioned. There are of course exceptions like Marie Curie, but in general this is the
finding and still if we look today at what we regard the ideal scientific personality, it's still
predominantly male scientists we have in mind. You can also see this if you look at shares of
men and women at different stages of the academic career and what I brought with me today is the
chart from my Bundesland, Northern Westphalia, which shows clearly that at the level of students
to the left, Studierende, women and men are balanced 50-50 percent. Even if you look at
the students doing their degrees, we now have more women than men, almost 54 percent women,
but if you look at PhD students, if you look in particular at those doing their habilitation
and professors to the right, there's still a very big gap between men and women and at the level of
professors we now have about one third female and two third male professors.
We have to be careful with this graph because it's not a longitudinal
graph, it shows the situation in 2021, which means that of course today's students could develop
in another way, but there are still enough signs that show that the idea of the perception of who
is excellent and who can make an academic career differs a lot when it comes to men and women.
So the question is who becomes visible with her and or his research.
If we look at what is excellence, and this is my second point, I would like to spend some time
on this idea of excellence. What does it mean? It comes from Latin, excelore, to excel, to stand
out or excelencia, and if you look in German history, the academic history, it's a quite
recent phenomenon in the discourse on science and higher education, but it's also a very
important part of the German education policy. When I started, I did my PhD in 1995 and then there
was no idea of excellence, better excellence universities or other universities, they didn't
exist. So it started in the 2000s with this when new public management became a dominant idea
in German universities, and this meant that we had a changeover to stronger detailed control of
the university, to monitoring the results. We had a trend towards matricification of input and output
dimensions, and this contributed to this idea of what is excellent, we have to measure excellence,
and we have to develop criteria. When we talk about excellence, we have to differentiate between
different levels of excellence. Institutions can be excellent, this is not the political level,
it can also be personal excellence or the excellence of processes or results, these are different
things. In 2004 in Germany, we started with what we call the German excellence initiatives,
some of you are probably quite familiar with this idea, I was not. What was the aim of this
excellence initiative? It was to strengthen top level research in Germany and improve its
Presenters
Prof. Dr. Ute Klammer
Zugänglich über
Offener Zugang
Dauer
00:40:57 Min
Aufnahmedatum
2024-10-16
Hochgeladen am
2024-11-13 19:46:04
Sprache
en-US
Date: Wed. October 16, 2024
Event: FAU MoD Lecture
Event type: On-site / Online
Organized by: FAU MoD, the Research Center for Mathematics of Data at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (Germany)
FAU MoD Lecture: Discovering and Communicating Excellence. Raising awareness and developing competence on the topic of excellence and gender for postdocs and actors in university communication
Speaker: Prof. Dr. Ute Klammer
Affiliation: Universität Duisburg-Essen (Germany)
Abstract. Various studies provide evidence that women and men are perceived and evaluated differently in their scientific achievements. Male scientists tend to be favoured over their female colleagues. This male bias in the perception of performance and excellence is one of the reasons why many capable and talented female academics leave the higher education system, meaning that their potential in research and teaching is lost.
Linked to this “drop-out” is the observation that women as postdocs or junior professors are often only insufficiently visible (or made visible) and are therefore less likely than their male colleagues to be recognised as innovators by the public and their discipline – a “gender visibility gap” can be diagnosed here. But what is actually perceived as scientific “excellence” – and what do younger scientists understand by it? Where and how can and should they and their achievements be (made) visible?
The lecture presents results on the topics and questions mentioned from an interview study and workshops at various universities as part of the ongoing research and practice project EXENKO (www.exzellenz-entdecken.de) led by the speaker. The focus is also on a group that has so far received little attention in studies and equality policy projects and that can support the process of making research talents visible: The actors in university communication who work at the interface between science and the public.
See more details of this FAU MoD lecture at:
https://mod.fau.eu/faumod-lecture-discovering-and-communicating-excellence/