All of these words were either used thoughtlessly or with intentions worthy of criticism, especially in a public context.

All of these words were also chosen by the judges of the critical language awareness campaign Unwort des Jahres, Unword of the Year.

Reflecting and criticising the use of unwords aimed at raising awareness of stigmatising, misleading or inhumane language views.

Our keynote speaker Nina Jarnisch has been the spokesperson of the Unword of the Year campaign for years, drawing attention to the responsibility of speakers with regard to their excellence.

Nina Jarnisch is Professor of German Studies, Applied Linguistics at Tegendarmstadt.

After her studies at the universities of Malta and Heinz, she obtained her doctoral degree from the University of Regensburg and completed her habilitation in 2003.

She has been a visiting professor at various international universities, including Aarhus, Juviana, Bratislava, Helsinki, Ugo Academy University in Wibnall, before being appointed Professor of German Language in Tegendarmstadt in 2004.

Her areas of expertise comprise the language of science and science communication, advertising and business communication, culture and criticism of language, as well as discourse and text linguistics.

Her research focuses on how language is used in science, e.g. when a scientific text was considered a good text, what difficulties may arise when scientists from different subjects attempt to exchange ideas with one another, how science can be communicated to the public.

Nina Jarnisch is particularly interested in the relationship between science, politics, media and the public on problems of knowledge transfer and the question of communicative requirements related to specific fields of study.

Her current work focuses on the discursive handling of non-knowledge and uncertain knowledge in science and in the media, specifically in climate and biodiversity discourse, but also on questions of the middle state of scientists between media and politics.

With this focus, her work is closely related to our topic of the ethics and narratives of non-knowledge, both in the fictional and in the scientific or political context.

A note for our international participants, Professor Jarnisch's keynote will be held in German with English slides moving as account titles.

It is our pleasure to welcome you here today and we look forward to your keynote entitled Science and Science Communication Under the Condition of Non-Knowledge and Answering.

Thank you very much for the invitation.

I am very pleased with the interdisciplinary environment.

I am very pleased with the interdisciplinary environment.

I am very pleased with the interdisciplinary environment.

I am very pleased with the interdisciplinary environment.

I am very pleased with the interdisciplinary environment.

I am very pleased with the interdisciplinary environment.

We already see an example in English.

I will not focus on the linguistic analysis, but on the narrative of the examples of analysis.

I will not focus on the linguistic analysis, but on the narrative of the examples of analysis.

I will not focus on the linguistic analysis, but on the narrative of analysis.

I will not focus on the linguistic analysis, but on the narrative of analysis.

I will not focus on the linguistic analysis, but on the narrative of analysis.

I will not focus on the linguistic analysis, but on the narrative of analysis.

I will not focus on the linguistic analysis, but on the narrative of analysis.

I will not focus on the linguistic analysis, but on the narrative of analysis.

I will not focus on the linguistic analysis, but on the narrative of analysis.

A short theoretical-metodical introduction.

I am very pleased that the title is non-Solid.

I am very pleased that the title is non-Solid.

Peter Wehling, Stefan Böschen, Matthias Groß, and I am very pleased that the title is non-Solid.

I am very pleased that the title is non-Solid.

I am very pleased that the title is non-Solid.

Das ist das Annauen, das Annäuen, Annäuen.

Also das geht...

Ach, jetzt habe ich Entschuldigung.

Jetzt habe ich genau den Fehler gemacht, den ich nicht machen wollte.

Also es gibt drei Ebenen, die wir hier unterscheiden.

Das Wissen vom Nichtwissen, dann die Intentionalität vom Nichtwissen.

Also ist es absichtlich etwas nicht gewusst, ist es fahrlässig, hätte man etwas wissen können, ist es unvermeidbar.

Und die Zeitlichkeit vom Nichtwissen, also wie dauerhaft, ist es ein noch Nichtwissen oder ist es eben ein dauerhaft nicht erwerbbares Wissen.

Und hier würden es ergänzen um zwei weitere Zuschreibungsdimensionen, nämlich die sogenannten Träger vom Nichtwissen.

Also um wen gibt es denn, das ist nämlich auch in der Zuschreibung natürlich relevant.

Also nicht nur im Konflikt, dass der eine dem anderen das vorwirft, sondern auch zu fragen wie ist es eigentlich ein einzelner, der etwas nicht weiß, oder ein einzelner oder ist es ein Kollektiv, also ist es Gesellschaft oder ist es eine Disziplin oder so.

An den Beispielen wird das alles deutlicher werden, was das dann auch für eine Rolle im Diskurs spielt.

Und letztendlich ist die Referenz vom Nichtwissen, wir haben mit unserem Peter W. schon viel unterhalten darüber auch.